S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-Lab: Utku Turk (LING)
Controlling morphosyntactic competition through phonology
Abstract: I will be discussing a case of suspended affixation (SA) in Turkish and its unexpected interaction with suppletive morphology. SA is a phenomenon in which a certain affix(es) is affixed to the periphery of the coordination but interpreted for all coordinates, and it is analyzed with a deletion analysis where the affix(es) on the first conjunct is deleted after coordination. While it usually has an easy-going relation with phonology (deletion before phonology), the case with suppletion is a funny one. Erschler (2018) showed that non-word remnants are banned in Ossetic SA environments; yet, Guseva and Weisser (2018) demonstrated the exact opposite with Mari, creating a problematic picture for a uniform analysis of SA. Turkish provides a different picture. While non-words remnants are not allowed in Turkish, the distribution of SA with respect to non-harmonizing conjuncts and other pronominals tells us that the process of SA should involve both phonological and structural constraints at the same time.